Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > OK, I went with this wording, using "lock object is on" terminology.
> > Applied patch attached --- adjustments welcomed.
>
> I think you misunderstood the suggestion. This is not an improvement,
> it's just more confusion.
Well, I thought the "lock on" wording helped avoid the confusion but
obviously I didn't understand more than that. We did have similar
confusion when we clarified the locking C code. For me, "object" was
the stumbler. Do you have any suggested wording? Everyone seems to
agree it needs improvement.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +