Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > That doesn't mean that better integration cannot be worked on later, but
> > this illusion that a bug tracker must have magical total awareness of
> > the entire flow of information in the project from day one is an
> > illusion and has blocked this business for too long IMO.
>
> If it has only a partial view of the set of bugs being worked on, it's
> not going to meet the goals that are being claimed for it.
The problem with a bug tracker that only tracks some bugs is that people
will mistakenly believe the system is complete, when it is not.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +