Re: undead index

On Friday 06 May 2011 17:18:29 Tom Lane wrote:

Hi Tom,

> Possibly if
> you showed us the actual (not obfuscated) table declaration, associated
> constraint declarations, and resulting index definition, things would be
> clearer.

Thanks Tom, yes, the index is named
Indexes:
    "concurrently" btree (ulq_guid)
In the 8.4 cluster and 9.0.4's pg_dumpall dumps it as

CREATE INDEX concurrently ON foo USING btree (ulq_guid);

That's it.
But shouldn't pg_upgrade be able to handle this?

Regards, Jens