Re: undead index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jens Wilke
Тема Re: undead index
Дата
Msg-id 201105061701.06448.jens.wilke@affinitas.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: undead index  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: undead index
Список pgsql-general
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 17:32:50 Tom Lane wrote:

> Hmm, is this an autogenerated index?

I don't think so.
And to confirm, that i really deleted the new cluster between the pg_upgrade
run and the dump|restore i did it again and was able to revive this index
again:

foo=# \d+ foo.bar_idx
      Index "foo.bar_idx"
  Column  |         Type          | Definition | Storage  | Description
----------+-----------------------+------------+----------+-------------
 ulq_guid | character varying(24) | ulq_guid   | extended |
btree, for table "foo.foo"

But it's again not in the pg_dumpall output, using the same binary like for
the dump|restore.

Regards, Jens

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bidirectional replication
Следующее
От: Iain Barnett
Дата:
Сообщение: Locale and UTF8 for template1 in 8.4.4