Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.
Дата
Msg-id 20110401045629.GA9314@tornado.gateway.2wire.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:11:49AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> >> I think this is a manifestation the same problem mentioned here:
> >>
> >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=31b6fc06d83c6de3644c8f2921eb7de0eb92fac3
> >>
> >> I believe this requires some refactoring to fix. ?It would be good to do that.
> >
> > The best way I can see is to make ATExecAddColumn more like ATExecDropColumn,
> > ATAddCheckConstraint, and ATExecDropConstraint. ?Namely, recurse at Exec-time
> > rather than Prep-time, and cease recursing when we satisfy the ADD COLUMN with a
> > merge. ?Did you have something else in mind?
>
> I had exactly what you just said in mind.

Patch attached, then.

> > Incidentally, when we satisfy an ADD COLUMN with a merge, we do not check or
> > update attnotnull:
<details ... what should we do?>

> Not sure.  I think that anything we do here is bound to have some
> corner cases that are not quite right for so long as NOT NULL
> constraints aren't represented in pg_constraint, and it's way too late
> to dredge up that issue again for 9.1.  I'm somewhat inclined to just
> defer fixing it until we get that work committed.

OK.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: corner case about replication and shutdown
Следующее
От: Brendan Jurd
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific