* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Making DDL serializable is *not* simple, and half-baked hacks won't
> make that situation better ...
Sorry, that obviously didn't come across clearly (I think I've just been
talking to Kevin far too much).
I'm not interested in making them serializable. I'd like to not have
tables randomly appear during a serializable transaction.
Thanks,
Stephen