Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
От | Gianni Ciolli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110325084616.GA4058@albo.gi.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 08:14:21PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:36:14AM +0000, Gianni Ciolli wrote: > > maybe we should change the "1000 digits" here: > > > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-NUMERIC-DECIMAL > > > > because ISTM that up to 2^17 digits are supported (which makes more > > sense than 1000). > > Agreed. The documentation is suggestive of this limit: > > # CREATE TABLE n (c numeric(1001,0)); > ERROR: NUMERIC precision 1001 must be between 1 and 1000 > LINE 1: CREATE TABLE n (c numeric(1001,0)); > > However, that's indeed just a limit of the numeric typmod representation, not > the data type itself. An unqualified "numeric" column hits no such limit. For the record, the limits I found from my tests are: * 2^17 - 1 maximum total digits * 2^14 - 1 maximum fractional digits (I did tests as I couldn't extract any obvious limit from the source code of numeric.c) Best regards, Dr. Gianni Ciolli - 2ndQuadrant Italia PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support gianni.ciolli@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndquadrant.it
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: