Read uncommitted ever possible?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От hans wulf
Тема Read uncommitted ever possible?
Дата
Msg-id 20110310123103.31170@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Read uncommitted ever possible?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Read uncommitted ever possible?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Re: Read uncommitted ever possible?  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

if you want to do dirty counts or sums or any aggreate stuff, you will always have to visit the table. For many
applicationsnobody cares about 0,01% inaccuracy.
 

If you could keep the data that has to be aggregated in the index you could approximate values really fast.

But because "Read uncommitted" is not implemented you will always have to visit the table. This is one reason why
peoplehave to still buy oracle.
 

I don't know the postgres code, but I don't thing it is a big deal, not to care about consistancy. The code for
executingsuch a query should be quite basic, because no MVCC-Stuff has to be done.
 

Will this feature come any time soon? Even if "Read uncommitted" is a "could read all sorts of old and dirty stuff" it
isstill better than nothing.
 
-- 
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!            
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files)
Следующее
От: Zotov
Дата:
Сообщение: Prefered Types