Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20110217015336.GK4116@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient
> to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.
I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would,
and certainly don't agree with it.
> Whereas, if we get rid of readline, it no longer matters whether we
> depend on OpenSSL.
I agree w/ the other responses to this, in particular from Stark, but I
just wanted to point out that we're much more likely to come across
other GPL-licensed things that we want to support linking against (and
who might link against us..) than OpenSSL-type-licensed things..
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: