Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
Дата
Msg-id 201102031654.p13GsTo09143@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?  (Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-docs
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
> in the Acronyms section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
>
> I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
> "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
>
> I've created a patch, but which should we use?

"Procedural Languages" is correct.  Patch applied.  Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Kupershmidt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Change to kernel-resources