Re: SSI patch version 12

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:52:09PM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I think we still need the vxid.  It shows in the pg_locks view, and
> we might possibly need it to find the right process to cancel once we
> have some way to do that.  But there's no point with having the tag
> level anymore.

Oh, right, we do use it to generate pg_lock_status. I forgot about that
particular tendril of code that extends outside of predicate.c.

> Dan, if you're not already working on these, I'll take them, so you
> can focus on 2PC.

All yours! But if you feel like renaming SerializableXactHashLock,
please hold off to prevent conflicts with my 2PC changes.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/