Re: Fixing pg_upgrade's check of available binaries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Fixing pg_upgrade's check of available binaries
Дата
Msg-id 201012291513.oBTFDF906796@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Fixing pg_upgrade's check of available binaries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I've been fooling around with creating upgrade-in-place support for the
> Fedora/RHEL RPMs.  What I want to have is a separate postgresql-upgrade
> RPM containing just the minimum possible set of previous-release files,
> together with pg_upgrade itself.  Experimenting with this convinced me
> that pg_upgrade is a few bricks shy of a load in its tests for whether
> the old and new clusters have the right binaries available:
> 
> * it insists on pg_dumpall and psql being present in the old cluster,
> though they are not in fact called
> * it fails to check for pg_resetxlog, even though it needs it in both
> old and new clusters
> * it fails to check for pg_config, which it does need in the new
> cluster.  It does not however really need it in the old cluster,
> because it has no use for the old cluster's --pkglibdir path.
> 
> I propose the attached patch to clean these things up.  Any objections?

Looks good to me.  I was not super-strict about checking binaries
because I assumed a full install on both clusters, but it doesn't hurt
to make that more specific.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility