On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:40:31AM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> >That we're in the position of having prevN_wd for N = 1..5 as the
> >current code exists is a sign that we need to refactor the whole
> >thing, as you've suggested before.
> >
> >I'll work up a design and prototype for this by this weekend.
>
> Great. I don't think issues around tab completion are enough to
> block the next alpha though, and it sounds like the next stage of
> this needs to gel a bit more before it will be ready to commit
> anyway. I'm going to mark the remaining bits here as returned for
> now, and trust that you'll continue chugging away on this so we can
> get it into the next CF early.
Will chug.
"By this weekend" may have been a touch optimistic. "This weekend"
seems a little more realistic :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate