Postgres Professional
en

Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows

От: Andres Freund
Тема: Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 201012071920.37146.andres@anarazel.de
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Kevin Grittner", )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andres Freund, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Craig James, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
  Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Richard Broersma, )
   Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Kenneth Marshall, )
    Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
     Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Craig James, )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Gary Doades, )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Kevin Grittner", )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Pierre C", )
       Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Craig James, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Scott Marlowe, )
          Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Gael Le Mignot, )
           Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Scott Marlowe, )
           Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Pierre C", )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Richard Broersma, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Justin Pitts, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Rob Wultsch, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Robert Haas, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
          Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Robert Haas, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
  Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Gary Doades, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Mladen Gogala, ) 
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 18:34:25 Tom Polak wrote:
> Then I did the same test via Postgresql and it took 8.85 seconds!  I tried
> it again as I thought I did something wrong.  I did a few tweaks such as
> increasing the shared buffers.  Still the best I could get it to was 7.5
> seconds.  This is insanely slow compared to MSSQL 2000.  What am I missing.
> Here is my SQL statement for postgresql:
> select name,address,city,state,statename,stateid,other from pgtemp1 left
> join pgtemp2 on state=stateid
I think you would at least provide the exact schema and possibly some example
data (pg_dump) to get us somewhere.

I would suggest you post the output of EXPLAIN ANALYZE $yourquery - that gives
us information about how that query was executed.

Greetings,

Andres

В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

Предыдущее:
От: Ivan Voras
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance under contention
Следующее:
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance under contention