Re: alter table add column - specify where the column will go?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Bex
Тема Re: alter table add column - specify where the column will go?
Дата
Msg-id 20101124103244.GC19975@frohike.homeunix.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: alter table add column - specify where the column will go?  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: alter table add column - specify where the column will go?  (Stuart McGraw <smcg2297@frii.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:37:02AM +0000, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> just never use SELECT *, but always call columns by names. You'll
> avoid having to depend on the order of columns, which is never
> guaranteed, even if the table on disk is one order, the return columns
> could be in some other.

People have been saying that on this list forever, and I agree you
shouldn't *depend* on column order, but why does INSERT syntax allow
you to omit the column names?

INSERT INTO sometable VALUES (1, 2, 3);

If columns inherently don't have an ordering, this shouldn't be
possible because it would make no sense.

Things like this INSERT syntax and the fact that columns are always
returned in the same order when you "SELECT *" or when you check the
table definition with \d condition people to expect being able to
influence the order of columns.

Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                            -- Donald Knuth

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Gravsjö
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Debug advice when postgres connection maxing out
Следующее
От: AI Rumman
Дата:
Сообщение: FTS is taking "