On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:33:00AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:55:07AM +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > >> Do we need to 'add' it?
> > > Possibly. My understanding is that it couldn't really replace it.
> >
> > Ah, I see. I was wrong. We can have modification privileges for
> > views even if they have no INSTEAD OF triggers.
>
> Right.
>
> > So, I think your original patch is the best solution. We could use
> > has_table_privilege() additionally, but we need to consider any
> > other places if we use it. For example, DROP privileges, etc.
>
> That seems like a matter for a separate patch. Looking this over, I
> found I'd created a query that can never get used, so please find
> enclosed the next version of the patch :)
Could someone please commit this? :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate