Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201010011923.41715.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly? (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 01 October 2010 18:48:25 Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 01.10.2010 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: > > BTW, I've noticed that "git push" will reject an attempt to push an > > update in one branch if my other branches are not up to date, even > > if I am not trying to push anything for those branches. That's > > pretty annoying too; is there a way around that? > > Yeah, that's annoying. You can do "git push origin <branch>", and it > will only try to push that branch, ignoring the others. If you want that as a default behaviour: "For example, to default to pushing only the current branch to origin use git config remote.origin.push HEAD. Any valid <refspec> (like the ones in the examples below) can be configured as the default for git push origin." Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: