Re: Version Numbering

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: Version Numbering
Дата
Msg-id 20100820214727.GD31484@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Version Numbering  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 04:41:20PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:47 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> >> The current system give people the completely false impression
> >> that 7.0 and 7.4 are somehow similar.
> >
> > On what planet?
> 
> Look at other DBMSes:
> Oracle: 8i, 9i, 10g, 11g
> Informix 9, 10, 11
> MS SQL Server 7, 2000, 2005, 2008
> 
> note the lack of dotes (and even if they actually have dots, those
> are minor versions).

Some people dote on dots.

> is not only confusing but make people think we are somehow behind
> the others... someone actually told me that Oracle is in version 11
> we only in version 8 so Oracle should have more features...  no that
> i follow that reasoning but...

"This one goes up to 11!" ;)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Version Numbering
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Version Numbering