On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:46:57PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/8/18 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> >> Apart from the medians, which "median-like" aggregates do you
> >> have in mind to start with? If you can provide examples of
> >> "median-like" aggregates that people might need to implement as
> >> user-defined aggregates, or other places where people would use
> >> this machinery, it will make your case stronger for this
> >> refactoring.
> >
> > There would be plenty of scope to re-use the machinery without any
> > SQL-level extensions. All you need is a polymorphic aggregate
> > transition function that maintains a tuplestore or whatever. I
> > don't see that extra syntax in CREATE AGGREGATE is really buying
> > much of anything.
> >
>
> Have we to use a transisdent function? If we implement median as
> special variant of aggregate - because we need to push an sort, then
> we can skip a transident function function - and call directly final
> function. This mechanism is used for aggregates with ORDER BY now.
> So there can be a special path for direct call of final func. There
> is useles to call transident function.
Just a wacky idea here. Could we make a special state transition
function called IDENTITY or some such that would turn into a noop?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate