On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:11:35AM -0700, Nick wrote:
> Is this the most efficient way to write this query? Id like to get a
> list of users that have the categories 1, 2, and 3?
>
> SELECT user_id FROM user_categories WHERE category_id IN (1,2,3) GROUP
> BY user_id HAVING COUNT(*) = 3
>
> users_categories (user_id, category_id)
> 1 | 1
> 1 | 2
> 1 | 3
> 2 | 1
> 2 | 2
> 3 | 1
> 4 | 1
> 4 | 2
> 4 | 3
>
> The result should produce 1 & 4.
The above method depends on (user_id, category_id) being unique, and
excludes users with, say, categories 1, 2, 3 and 4. Are you sure that
that latter is what you want?
This is, I believe, a little clearer as to what it's actually doing,
and doesn't exclude user_ids with more matches:
SELECT user_id
FROM user_categories
GROUP BY user_id
HAVING array_agg(category_id) @> ARRAY[1,2,3]
ORDER BY user_id; /* Not really needed, but could be handy */
In 9.0, you'll be able to use the following to get only exact matches:
SELECT user_id
FROM user_categories
GROUP BY user_id
HAVING array_agg(category_id ORDER BY category_id) = ARRAY[1,2,3]
ORDER BY user_id; /* Not really needed, but could be handy */
Until then, you can make an array_sort() function like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION array_sort(ANYARRAY)
RETURNS ANYARRAY
LANGUAGE SQL
STRICT
AS $$
SELECT ARRAY(
SELECT unnest($1) AS i
ORDER BY i
);
$$;
then use it like this:
SELECT user_id
FROM user_categories
GROUP BY user_id
HAVING array_sort(array_agg(category_id)) = ARRAY[1,2,3]
ORDER BY user_id;
to get only exact matches.
As to speed, you'd have to test on your actual data sets. Indexing
user_id may help here.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate