Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... indeed. Is it worth burdening the pg_stats mechanism with this?
> >> The use case seems vanishingly thin.
>
> > I am confused how this is different from inet_server_addr() and
> > inet_server_port().
>
> I think the point is to let someone find out *from another session*
> which server port number a particular session is using. I fail to see
> a significant use case for that, though.
Uh, aren't they all using the same server port number, e.g. 5432? Is
the issue different IP addresses for the same server?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com