Re: pg_trgm

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: pg_trgm
Дата
Msg-id 20100528.005124.14213795.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_trgm  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> So I think a GUC is broken because pg_tgrm has a index opclasses and
> any indexes built using one setting will be broken if the GUC is
> changed.
> 
> Perhaps we need two sets of functions (which presumably call the same
> implementation with a flag to indicate which definition to use). Then
> you can define an index using one or the other and the meaning would
> be stable.

It's worse. pg_trgm has another compile option "IGNORECASE" which
might affect index opclasses.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Straightforward Synchronous Replication
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: List traffic