Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?)
> > >
> > > Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"?
> >
> > Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like
> > its been through Google translate.
>
> LOL, good one.
>
> I assume it was done so it would start with 'wal', but I see
> 'max_wal_senders', which doesn't start with 'wal' and would match your
> suggestion exactly. I think we should either rename 'wal_keep_segments'
> or 'max_wal_senders'.
Uh, did we decide that 'wal_keep_segments' was the best name for this
GUC setting? I know we shipped beta1 using that name.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com