Re: [9.0beta5/cvs head] build failure due to unchecked results

Peter Eisentraut [2010-04-30 14:56 +0300]:
> You probably mean alpha5, unless you come from the future. ;-)

FYI, those are next week's lottery numbers: 12, 19, ...

Right, of course I mean alpha-5, sorry.

> That was actually a mistake in the packaging

Oh, I see. Well, for a mistake the code is surprisingly well-behaved.
Those three or four patch hunks is all it takes to make it build, and
sometimes those warnings are indeed useful; if for nothing else, then
to make you think explicitly why it's okay to ignore a short or failed
write().

> I suggest you hold off for a day or two and wait for beta1.

Sure, thank you!

Martin
--=20
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)