Re: Tuple storage overhead

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Bex
Тема Re: Tuple storage overhead
Дата
Msg-id 20100420090505.GJ11616@frohike.homeunix.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Tuple storage overhead  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28:36AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> If you are storing big data and want to keep the overhead low, the
> first thing you need to examine is organizing your data into arrays.
> This involves tradeoffs of course and may not work but it's worth a
> shot!

That does sound interesting.  However, I'm storing several hundreds or
thousands of data points (depending on the data set).  How is Postgresql's
overhead when it comes to extracting one or two items from an array in
a query?

Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                            -- Donald Knuth

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Bex
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Tuple storage overhead
Следующее
От: Alban Hertroys
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Ltree - how to sort nodes on parent node