Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT
| От | Andreas Kretschmer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20100405071026.GA5610@tux обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT (Cliff Wells <cliff@develix.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: INSERT INTO...RETURNING vs SELECT
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Cliff Wells <cliff@develix.com> wrote: > As far as I can see, INSERT INTO...RETURNING is semantically equivalent > to SELECT...FROM with a side-effect, so it seems this construct should > work. Can someone shed some light? Well, at the moment you can't reuse the RETURNING-values, you have to wait for 9.1, writeable CTE. Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: