Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > What about:
> > archive_command = 'test ! -f ...%f && cp %p ...%f'
>
> Perhaps, though I still think this isn't an improvement over the
> original.
His complaint was that .../%f looks like ../%f; is that a valid
concern? I have reverted the change. Also, should we be using test !
-e instead of -f?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com