Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> > Oops. There might be two solutions for the issue:
> > 1. Use explicit locks. The lock primitive will be pthread_mutex for
> > multi-threaded implementations or semaphore for multi-threaded ones.
> > 2. Use per-thread log files.
> > File names would be "pgbench_log.<main-process-id>.<thread-id>".
>
> I think #1 is out of the question, as the synchronization overhead will
> do serious damage to the whole point of having a multithreaded pgbench.
> #2 might be a reasonable idea.
Ok, I'll go for #2.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center