Re: Function scan push-down using SQL/MED syntax
| От | Takahiro Itagaki |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Function scan push-down using SQL/MED syntax |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20100309173213.99DD.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Function scan push-down using SQL/MED syntax (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Function scan push-down using SQL/MED
syntax
|
| Список | pgsql-cluster-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote: > So, as the first step we implement it by tuplestore with the present > libpq, but for further improvement we need to refactor or to extend > our libpq to buffer some sized tuples. Or invent another > more-data-fetching-oriented protocol like existing copy? Before starting such optimization, we need some research for which part is the performance bottleneck when sending large amount of data. IMHO, since network is typically slower than in-memory data copy, data compression and burst-transport would be more effective even if they consume local CPU resources to convert the data format. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-cluster-hackers по дате отправления: