Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot

I don't see this as every having been applied.  What should we do with
it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus  writes:
> > Tom,
> >> Is anyone interested enough to try it if I code it?
> 
> > If you're patient for results, sure.  I seem to be doing a customer 
> > migration or upgrade every week now, so it wouldn't take me long to have 
> > a test subject with a fairly complex database.
> 
> Here's a draft patch that does ordering using two lists, as I proposed.
> Please test to see if it's any faster or slower than the original logic.
> 
> Note: since this changes struct TocEntry, be sure to recompile all files
> in src/bin/pg_dump/ after patching.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 

Content-Description: alternate-parallel-restore-1.patch.gz

[ Type application/octet-stream treated as attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--  Bruce Momjian          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +