Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest
Дата
Msg-id 201002241537.o1OFbHs06694@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> >> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> >>> per http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Release_Support_Policy 7.4 is
> >>> still supported for a few months to come (and will be EOL'd together with
> >>> 8.0). I'm also not really sure why we need to change stuff like that, this
> >>> kind of information might still be useful for somebody trying to upgrade
> >>> from an unsupported release to a supported one.
> >> 
> >> Yeah.
> 
> > Well, the documentation still exists in the old releases, even 8.4.  The
> > big question is how much back-version information we should keep in our
> > docs, and does it make sense to keep paragraphs around that are only
> > meaningful to < 1% of people reading it.  Some people are saying keep
> > more, some are saying keep less, so I am betting I have hit the proper
> > balance.  ;-)
> 
> I didn't really agree with what you took out before, and I am definitely
> going to object to this latest set of diffs.  What it appears to me
> you have done is a search-and-destroy on any paragraph mentioning "7.x",
> without any consideration of whether that removes important information
> from the overall presentation.  Those paras are generally comparing old
> and new behavior, and even if you don't care specifically what the old
> behavior was, they present useful explanation of the new behavior.

Yea, let me try again and rephrase some of it to highlight the behavior
and not the version change.

> I also agree with the objection that there are still lots of people who
> are going to be trying to port old apps to 9.0.

Well, I stand by my statement that it is a judgement call on how much we
keep, and there is a cost to readers to keep it, but there isn't very
much of it.  Are the people who wanted more aggressive removal OK with
putting back the pre-7.4 documentation mentions?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest