Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

On Friday 29 January 2010 23:47:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help,
> > > > at all.
> > > 
> > > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items.  This
> > > is a work item, and not a small one.
> > 
> > What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in
> > 9.1?
> 
> You mean turned on by default, right?
Obviously, yes ;-)

Andres