On Friday 25 December 2009 10:27:09 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >> although I don't know why it didn't bite on 8.2 unless it's specifically
> >> when 64-bit timestamps are processed.
> >
> > You might want to confirm your 8.4 installation is using integer
> > datetimes as there is some variability in its useage among packagers.
> > Follow this thread for one such discussion:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-07/msg01119.php
>
> Thanks Adrian, noted. I'm hoping to get onto 8.4 before too long because
> of the analytic functions but that thread suggests that the best course
> of action would be to make sure that my code is robust against the new
> server and then decide on an upgrade schedule.
>
> I'm building from scratch here so all options are as default except for
> added Perl.
>
> --
Alright then, nothing worse then trying to fix a problem that does not exist :)
One other thing that came to mind in regards to the the 'changed record'
problem is whether Row Versioning has been checked in the ODBC connection
parameters?
--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver@comcast.net