Re: Range types
От | tomas@tuxteam.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Range types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091215052609.GA15629@tomas обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Range types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:32:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: [...] > (Also, stuff like strings simply doesn't have any sane concept of a > unique next or previous value. If you are willing to limit the length, then yes, you could consider them discrete too, but... > I think the number of types that are > really discrete in this sense is very small, like maybe just ints and > enums.) ...I do agree that ranges over continuous types are the more "interesting"[1] (and possibly more useful) beast. - --------- [11] Unfortunaltel they could turn out to be "interesting" in the sense of "may you live in interresting times" ;-) Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLJx3xBcgs9XrR2kYRAn10AJ9f/MQiz45LS7ogsRmMXpawcOWSfgCggkWG gFev/SS09O+IOO+FB3shav0= =KwxB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: