Re: List of PostgreSQL Forks
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: List of PostgreSQL Forks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200910012318.10670.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: List of PostgreSQL Forks (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thursday 01 October 2009 06:10:26 Markus Wanner wrote: > Hi, > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > PostGIS is not a fork. Not sure where that idea comes from. > > Neither do I personally consider Postgres-R a fork. I still think of it > as a (rather huge) patch, a bit like SE-PostgreSQL. However, it clearly > depends on your definition of what a "fork" is. > > Maybe "based on Postgres" or similar would better describe the list (and > allow even more projects to be named)? > We use the term "Postgres derived databases" on the wiki. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_derived_databases I'd note that we didn't think Postgres-R was beyond a big patch either, so it isn't listed. -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: