Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet
Дата
Msg-id 20090908150636.GB549@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet  (Kristian Larsson <kristian@spritelink.net>)
Ответы Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet  (Kristian Larsson <kristian@spritelink.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Kristian Larsson wrote:

> And poking in pg_operator / pg_type seems to confirm this:
>
> nils=# SELECT (SELECT typname FROM pg_type WHERE typelem=oprleft), oprname, (SELECT typname FROM pg_type WHERE
typelem=oprright)FROM pg_operator WHERE oprleft=(SELECT typelem FROM pg_type WHERE typname='_inet') AND oprname='+'; 
>  ?column? | oprname | ?column?
> ----------+---------+----------
>  _inet    | +       | _int8
> (1 row)

That query is wrong -- type _inet is actually another way to spell
inet[].  What you want is this, that also confirms your problem:

alvherre=# SELECT oprleft::regtype, oprname, oprright::regtype, oprresult::regtype FROM pg_operator WHERE
(oprleft='inet'::regtypeOR oprright = 'inet'::regtype) AND oprname='+'; 
 oprleft | oprname | oprright | oprresult
---------+---------+----------+-----------
 inet    | +       | bigint   | inet
 bigint  | +       | inet     | inet
(2 filas)


> Am I doing it the wrong way? Bug?

I'd say this is just a missing feature.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martin Gainty
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet
Следующее
От: Sam Mason
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to store data on an external drive