Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Дата
Msg-id 20090908022246.GT8894@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Ответы Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Список pgsql-performance
Karl Denninger escribió:

> The individual boolean fields don't kill me and in terms of some of the
> application issues they're actually rather easy to code for.
>
> The problem with re-coding for them is extensibility (by those who
> install and administer the package); a mask leaves open lots of extra
> bits for "site-specific" use, where hard-coding booleans does not, and
> since the executable is a binary it instantly becomes a huge problem for
> everyone but me.

Did you try hiding the bitmask operations inside a function as Tom
suggested?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karl Denninger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types