On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> This seems a good idea. Possibly pushing the betas more
> >> aggresively to current users would make them tested not only by
> >> PG hackers ...
>
> > Isn't this the purpose of the new alpha releases, at lease to some
> > extent.
>
> The alpha releases as currently constituted are practically the
> exact opposite of what's being suggested here :-(. We are pushing
> them out without very much advertisement, and certainly without any
> formal program to encourage significant testing. That's more or
> less forced by the decision that alpha releases should be
> low-overhead, but I think we're unlikely to get wide-ranging test
> coverage that way.
How would you recommend that this change?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate