Re: Shipping documentation untarred
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: Shipping documentation untarred
Дата
Msg-id
200908111242.36963.peter_e@gmx.net
Ответ на
Re: Shipping documentation untarred (Alvaro Herrera)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Shipping documentation untarred Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Shipping documentation untarred Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
On Monday 10 August 2009 21:53:57 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I understand that the placement of the generated docs in the sourcedir > instead of the builddir is so that it is included in the tarball, > correct? I admit I was surprised by that change. I did point that out upthread, with you in particular in mind. ;-) I've been thinking that we could actually get rid of that build-in-srcdir behavior, which also occasionally puzzles vpath users with respect to gram.c and so on. The new behavior would be to build targets in the local directory. The only requirement would be that distribution tarballs be built in-tree, so that the stuff that is distprep'ed actually ends up in the tarball, but I think that should not be a problem.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления