Michael Nacos escribió:
> I would be very surprised if logging had a significant overhead any method
> you choose. there's probably something very wrong with your setup if this
> is the case.
Either something very wrong, or the load is extremely high. In the
latter case perhaps it would make sense to ship syslog to a remote
machine. Since it uses UDP sockets, it wouldn't block when overloaded
but rather lose messages (besides, it means it has low overhead).
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.