Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:18:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> KaiGai,
> 
> * KaiGai Kohei (kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
> > I began to describe the list of abstraction layer functions (but not completed yet):
> >   http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_Abstraction
> 
> I'm not really a huge fan of 'security_' as a prefix for these
> functions, but I don't have a better suggestion right now.

Just generally, "access control" is a great way to describe what's
actually happening here.  That people conflate access control with
security has resulted in a number of disasters :P

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate