Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Дата
Msg-id 200907242324.29165.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms  (Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu@sraoss.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Friday 26 June 2009 12:07:24 Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
> Included is a conceptual patch to use intptr_t. Comments are welcome.

After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts 
whether this patch actually does anything.  Foremost, it doesn't touch the 
definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like 
this.

Now I see that you call this a "conceptual patch".  Perhaps we should wait 
until you have developed it into a complete patch?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: When is a record NULL?