Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again
От
Alvaro Herrera
Тема
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again
Дата
Msg-id
20090724165431.GB15591@alvh.no-ip.org
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block"
again Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Joshua Tolley escribió: > Have you tried this? I expect if you give it a shot, you'll find you don't > actually have this problem. Really, everything is always in a transaction. If > you haven't explicitly opened one, PostgreSQL opens one for you before each > statement, and issues a COMMIT afterwards (or a ROLLBACK, if your statement > ran into an error). Statements within functions are always executed within the > same transaction, so you can issue SAVEPOINT commands anywhere in PL/pgSQL > functions without problems, because you're always in a transaction. No, actually you can't call SAVEPOINT inside a PL/pgSQL function (or any SPI user for that matter -- have you tried savepoints in LOLCODE?) Inside PL/pgSQL the only way to use savepoints is with EXCEPTION blocks. You are correct that you're always in a transaction, but in this context not all transactions are equal :-( (The problem, as we found out, is that the function must always have control at the same level of transaction nestedness in SPI; you can't just let the user define and release savepoints arbitrarily.) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
От: Joshua Tolley
Дата: