Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sam Mason
Тема Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?)
Дата
Msg-id 20090723140331.GA5407@samason.me.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?)  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:45:36PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks

Just had a quick flick through your list and one of the early ones stuck
out:


http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks#Attention_on_IS_NULL_and_IS_NOT_NULL_operators_for_composite_types

is scary; even worse is that it was changed to be like this in 8.2
because the standard says it should behave this way.  What on earth were
they thinking when they defined the standard this way?

--
  Sam  http://samason.me.uk/

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problem with pg_restore?
Следующее
От: Sam Mason
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problem with pg_restore?