Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20090723105516.GJ23840@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again (Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
* Glenn Maynard (glenn@zewt.org) wrote:
> > The ORM can't control transactions, can't call functions or can't set
> > savepoints?
>
> It can't write the necessary SQL to say "insert this unless it already
> exists", namely:
If it can't cleanly handle failure cases like this one, then I think
your issue is with your ORM and not with PG. An INSERT failing on a
uniqueness violation is actually a rather big deal in a relational
database and not erroring on it goes quite against data integrity
considerations.
If your ORM could call a function instead, you could handle the insert
and error-check in the function, to make up for the lack of intelligence
in the ORM. Another option would be to have a 'fake' table, which has
no rows in it and just has an 'ON INSERT' trigger that calls a function
to handle this. That could also be a view with a do-instead rule, if
the ORM has to query the same table.
I would think the time would better be spent fixing the ORM though.
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: