Robert Haas wrote:
> > If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we
> > can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch
> > author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; ?the same goes
> > for dealing with known bugs. ?I know it can be done, but I don't promise
> > it would be pleasant.
>
> Also agreed. It's never pleasant to have a patch rejected/postponed,
> but it's tolerable if you've gotten some feedback and understand the
> reasons why. Of course there is no guarantee that you will agree with
> those reasons, but that's life. Some day you may be the committer and
> have your turn to irritate patch submitters. :-)
Our only limitation is our own sense that we have been fair to patch
authors, i.e. there is no external restriction on how we handle things.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +