Re: Block_Size on NTFS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Block_Size on NTFS
Дата
Msg-id 200906091158.n59BwkG06270@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Block_Size on NTFS  (postgresqlgeneral.domain.thewild_codata@spamgourmet.com)
Ответы Re: Block_Size on NTFS  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Re: Block_Size on NTFS  (postgresqlgeneral.domain.thewild_codata@spamgourmet.com)
Список pgsql-general
postgresqlgeneral.domain.thewild_codata@spamgourmet.com wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> Reading through the list of settings returned by "SHOW ALL", I noticed
> the "block_size" variable, which defaults to 8192.
>
> Running on Windows Server, my data directory is on an NTFS partition.
> Running CHKDSK on this partition tells me that there are "4096 bytes in
> each allocation unit."
>
> Are these allocation units the same as the "block_size", or does this
> only have to do with disk geometry ?
> If they are the same, is it important that they match ?

It is not necessary they match.  It just means that Postgres extends
files in 8k chunks while your file system extends them in 4k chunks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Text search without dictionary ?
Следующее
От: Martin Gainty
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sum of multiplied deltas