Re: search_path vs extensions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: search_path vs extensions
Дата
Msg-id 20090601190440.GG5716@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: search_path vs extensions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió:

> An
> alternative was to not have BEGIN/END but instead a GUC variable that
> you can SET to the name of the extension currently being added to.
> (The main advantage of that is that the state isn't hidden, but easily
> checkable via existing commands.)

With the CREATE EXTENSION you could still have a read-only GUC var
"current_extension" or so.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: search_path improvements
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file