Hi,
Quoting "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> That might work, but then we better be pretty darn confident that that
> "fresh conversion" is actually correct. I'd rather have them going
> side-by-side so that we can verify everything before shutting the old
> system off.
I agree, as long as you take non-incremental converters into account
as well. Otherwise, we'd mostly test functionality we don't need later
on (incremental updates).
>> BTW, can anyone comment on whether and how we can maintain the current
>> split between master repository (that's not even accessible to
>> non-committers) and a public mirror? If only from a standpoint of
>> security paranoia, I'd rather like to preserve that split, but I don't
>> know how well git will play with it.
>
> You can set up one repository to mirror another.
Yes, that's the point of a distributed VCS. The good thing about it is
that everybody is free to work (including committing) *on his own
copy* of the branch and then provide a patch (or patches) for
committers (or gain commit rights and upload his work later on). That
fits pretty well with the Postgres development process, AFAICT.
Regards
Markus Wanner