Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl

On Saturday 09 May 2009 00:50:28 Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Yes I apologize for that. Git reacted differently than I expected to a
> > "git diff". I have since reposted a proper patch.
>
> mmm ... I've recently been forced into using git for another project,
> and I find myself mystified as to why anyone would want to use it.
> Seems like baroqueness and unexpected behaviors are all over the thing.

Obviously, an unchecked cvs diff would have produced the same garbage.  Any 
other problems?